Difference between revisions of "GSAS Refinement Hints"

From Ug11bm
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Created page with " == Profile Terms == GSAS Profile 4 anisotropy Sxxx terms From: Robert Von Dreele <[email protected]> Date: July 29, 2011 Usually, I do the S4xx ones first & then the...")
 
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Profile Terms ==  
== Profile Terms ==  


GSAS Profile 4 anisotropy Sxxx terms
GSAS Profile 4 anisotropy Sxxx terms


  From: Robert Von Dreele <[email protected]>
  Re: the "best" order for incorporating profile 4 anisotropy Sxxx terms into a refinement?
Date: July 29, 2011
Robert Von Dreele writes: (July 28, 2011)
   
   
  Usually, I do the S4xx ones first & then the others. The thing is fairly stable after that. Do do all of them at once in any case  in the end. The S4xx must be > 0 but the rest can be any sign. If you want a quick way of seeing the shape, run mustrplot (spelling?) in GSAS; you'll need gnuplot to see the plot. For monoclinics, it might look like two beans back-to-back.
  "Usually, I do the S4xx ones first & then the others. The thing is fairly stable after that.
-Bob
Do do all of them at once in any case  in the end. The S4xx must be > 0 but the rest can be any sign.
If you want a quick way of seeing the shape, run mustrplot (spelling?) in GSAS;  
you'll need gnuplot to see the plot. For monoclinics, it might look like two beans back-to-back."
-Bob

Latest revision as of 15:34, 29 July 2011

Profile Terms

GSAS Profile 4 anisotropy Sxxx terms

Re: the "best" order for incorporating profile 4 anisotropy Sxxx terms into a refinement?

Robert Von Dreele writes: (July 28, 2011)

"Usually, I do the S4xx ones first & then the others. The thing is fairly stable after that.
Do do all of them at once in any case  in the end. The S4xx must be > 0 but the rest can be any sign.
If you want a quick way of seeing the shape, run mustrplot (spelling?) in GSAS; 
you'll need gnuplot to see the plot. For monoclinics, it might look like two beans back-to-back."
-Bob