Difference between revisions of "GSAS Profile Terms"

From Ug11bm
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 16: Line 16:
  precise wavelength = 0.412235
  precise wavelength = 0.412235
  data was collected on a spinning 0.8 mm diameter capillary of LaB6 660a
  data was collected on a spinning 0.8 mm diameter capillary of LaB6 660a
  The NIST LaB6 660a SRM certificate lattice value = 4.15691(1)  A]
  The NIST [https://wiki-ext.aps.anl.gov/ug11bm/index.php/NIST_SRM_Certificates LaB6 660a SRM certificate] lattice value = 4.15691(1)  A]
  The estimated muR ([https://wiki-ext.aps.anl.gov/ug11bm/index.php/X-ray_absorption_%26_fluorescence X-ray absorption]) is ~ 1.0  
  The estimated muR ([https://wiki-ext.aps.anl.gov/ug11bm/index.php/X-ray_absorption_%26_fluorescence X-ray absorption]) is ~ 1.0  
  collection Temp: 295 K
  collection Temp: 295 K

Revision as of 22:10, 4 January 2012

Peaks Profile terms for Rietveld Analysis

Most Rietveld refinement programs use a pseudo-Voigt term combining Gaussian and Lorentzian peak shapes (plus other correction terms). In general, the X-ray source can be described by a Gaussian function, while sample effects are described by Lorentzian terms.

For the synchrotron powder XRD data from 11-BM, the instrumental resolution is well described by Gaussian terms. Sample effects, such as size and microstrain broadening (i.e. local variations in the lattice parameters) are usually fit best by Lorentzian terms.

Please consult other references (such as the GSAS maunal) for details on Rietveld profile functions.

11-BM Profile Fitting

Representative LaB6 data for 11-BM (high resolution powder XRD) can be downloaded from the 11-BM webpage here (pick your format):


more details about this specific LaB6 SRM dataset follow:

precise wavelength = 0.412235
data was collected on a spinning 0.8 mm diameter capillary of LaB6 660a
The NIST LaB6 660a SRM certificate lattice value = 4.15691(1)  A]
The estimated muR (X-ray absorption) is ~ 1.0 
collection Temp: 295 K
2theta range: 0.5 deg - 50.0 deg
step size: 0.001 deg

My GSAS/EXPGUI refinement gives a good fit (image attached) with the following parameters:

SG: Pm-3m
a =  4.156917(1)
zero shift:  -0.00029 deg 2theta
La   @ 0, 0, 0 (Ui/Ue*100 =  0.62)
B  @  0.1984(1), 1/2, 1/2  (Ui/Ue*100 =  0.29)
GSAS Profile type 4:  (non-listed terms = 0.0)
Coeff.   :   GU         GV         GW             LX        S/L          H/L
Value    :  2.552E+00 -5.439E-01  5.990E-02   2.790E-01  1.2E-03  1.2E-03
4-term Shifted Chebyschev (type #1) background
wRp =  0.0645,    Rp = 0.0486
CHI**2 =  3.349     for   14 variables                     

Let me know if you need any additional information.



Conversion of pseudo-Voigt function terms

GSAS <-> Fullprof Gaussian Parameters GSAS Term <=> Fullprof Term : (description) GU = 1803.4 * U : (instrumental term, ~ tan^2 of theta) GV = 1803.4 * V : (instrumental term, ~ tan of theta) GW = 1803.4 * W : (instrumental term, ~ constant with theta) GP = 1803.4 * IG : (size broadening)

note: 1083.4 => centidegrees squared divided by 8*ln(2)


Lorentzian Parameters GSAS Term <=> Fullprof Term : (description) LX = 100 * Y : (size broadening) LY = 100 * X : (microstrain)

note: 100 => degrees to centidegrees


Finger-Cox-Jephcoat asymmetry parameters GSAS S/L = Fullprof S_L GSAS H/L = Fullprof D_L

Note: terms are equivalent

S / L = the sample “half height”/diffractometer radius H / L = the slit half height/diffractometer radius


"Typical values of Rietveld instrument profile coefficients" Kaduk J, Reid J. Powder Diffraction (2011) vol. 26 pp. 88


size and microstrain broadening (i.e. local variations in the lattice parameters) are Lorentzian for 11-BM data

Only rarely is Gaussian size broadening observed; this re- quires a very tight monodisperse distribution, which is rarely encountered in powder specimens but is sometimes seen in polycrystalline solid specimens such as pieces of metal.