Difference between revisions of "V4 Design: Record Processing"

From EPICSWIKI
 
(17 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
= EPICS V4: Record Processing =
EPICS V4: Record Processing November 02 2005  
August 16 2005  


NOTE: UNDER CONSTRUCTION
----
 
= Overview =


----
<b>UNRESOLVED ISSUES</b>
* This document is still evolving
* Monitors
** How will monitor data be managed?
** Big problem is how will array data be managed?
* Alarms
** How will V4 handle alarms?
* Events
** What is the V4 event model?
** What is required from the IOC database?


<center>
This document described semantics for V4 record processing that are
== Overview ==
different than for V3.
</center>
This includes the following:
* Semantics for record processing
* Semantics for Database and Channel Access Links.
* Record Locking
* Posting database monitors
* Status and Alarm Severity
* Access to array and structure fields.


This version is based of feedback from the EPICS core developer's
This version is based on feedback from the EPICS core developer's
meeting at ANL/APS on July 11th through July 14th.
meeting at ANL/APS on July 11th through July 14th.
It is also a companion to the V4 Design: dbdInterfaces wiki.
In addition discussions with Andrew Johnson and Eric Norum have
led to many of the ideas described below.
This wiki is a companion to the wiki "V4 Design: dbdInterfaces".


The V3 record processing semantics do not work well for data
V3 record processing semantics do not work well for data
acquisition applications. An example of data acquisition is:
acquisition applications. An example of data acquisition is:
*  Move sample to new position.
*  Move sample to new position.
Line 30: Line 48:


Leaving PACT 0 but not calling recGblFwdLink was not anticipated when the V3 record processing semantics were created.
Leaving PACT 0 but not calling recGblFwdLink was not anticipated when the V3 record processing semantics were created.
For V4 it must be posssible for a record to be processed while it is waiting
For V4 a record can be processed while it is waiting
for asynchronous processing to complete.
for asynchronous processing to complete.


Line 39: Line 57:
V4 record processing is designed to make data acquisition easier.
V4 record processing is designed to make data acquisition easier.
Both input and output links can wait for record processing.
Both input and output links can wait for record processing.
This must be done, however, without record support blocking.
This is done, however, without record support blocking.
If blocking makes it easier to implement record support,
If blocking makes it easier to implement record support,
then the support can spawn a separate thread that does block.
then the support can spawn a separate thread that does block.
Line 48: Line 66:


<center>
<center>
== V4 Link Semantics ==
= Overview of V4 Record Processing =
  </center>
  </center>


Lets first state some goals for linking to other records:
V4 will provide a replacement for dbProcess.
The name may be different but for now it will still be called dbProcess.


Instead of refering to forward links the name process links will be used.
In V4 database access and channel access appear the same to record and
The features described next will apply to links to records in
link support.
the same or in different IOCs, i.e. similar semantics will be available
Only the implementation knows the difference.
for both database and channel access links.
In this document the term channelAccess will mean access to a record.
Thus it can mean a workstation client or a field of
a record that is a link to a record.


* Input Link from another record
V4 also allows support for <b>struct</b> fields.
** get current value independent of processing state.
For example base provides support for  
** Ask the record to process and wait for completion before fetching value.
    field(common,struct(RecordCommon))
** wait until next time record processes then get value. No request is made to process the record.
In the record types provided with base, this is the first field.
* Output Link to another record
The fields in <tt>RecordCommon</tt> are the V4 replacement for
** put value without requesting that record be processed.
the V3 dbCommon fields.
** put value then process record but don't wait for processing to complete.
** put value, process record, and wait for completion
* process link to another record
** request processing but do not wait for completion
** request processing and wait for completion
* all links to other records
** Allow simultaneous requests, i.e. process links in parallel
** process one link at a time, i.e. process links serially.
** Record is unlocked while waiting for links to complete.


----
<center>
== V4 Processing States ==
</center>


Instead of the V3 PROC field, V4 will have a field processState.
V4 record processing has the following features.
This field will have the states:
; idle
: record is not being processed
; inputActive
: waiting for input links to complete
; active
: record is waiting for completion of record specific activity
; outputActive
: waiting for output or process links to complete
; processDone
: process has completed.


NOTES:
* database fields
* Each state may have substates. For example if a record has multiple record specific input links that are to be processed sequentially, it can keep state describing which link is being processed. 
** "owned" by database not record support
* Individual record types may have only a subset of the above states.
** fields can only be accessed via interfaces
* V3 link instances had attributes like CA, CP, CPP. For V4 these should be something like:
** support can optionally provide storage for data associated with a field
** process - a request to process the record before gets or after puts.
** for channelAccess all fields appear as type primitive, string, struct, array or combination thereof
** wait - a request to wait until the next time the record processes
* dbProcess
** parallel - OK to allow other gets/puts to operate simultaneously.
** processes synchronous linked records by queuing requests rather than recursive calls to dbProcess
** can be called an arbitrary number of times while record is active
* link
** always has associated support
** can be record link or can be something else, e.g. a link to hardware
* record link
** can request process and/or wait for asynchronous completion
** local synchronous requests queued by dbProcess
** record is active and can be processed while asynchronous links active
* struct fields
** Can have associated support which can be synchronous or asynchronous
* block
** is requested via a separate field
** if true than support waits for all outstanding I/O to complete before further processing
** if false than asynchronous support can proceed in parallel
* lock
** record instances are locked
** dbProcess locks before calling support
** other code can also lock
** Two records can be locked without deadlock
* monitors
** dbProcess handles monitors
** support triggers monitors by writing to fields




== V4 iocRecord ==
iocRecord is the V4 successor to the V3 dbCommon.
For V4 it is a separate software component.
** FLNK (forward link) is replaced by an array of process links.
----
<center>
<center>
== dbProcess ==
= Database Fields =
  </center>
  </center>
== Field Access by Support Code ==
Support code can access database fields only via interfaces implemented by
the IOC database.
Thus record fields are owned by the IOC database not by record support.


The functionality described in this section will be divided between
Support code can register to provide storage for particular fields.
iocCore and iocRecord. iocRecord is the V4 successor to the V3 dbCommon.
For example support code could implement a circular buffer for field <tt>value</tt>.
For V4 it is a separate software component. An important note is
When some other code
that FLNK (forward link) is replaced by an array of process links.
request the array associated with <tt>value</tt>, the IOC database
calls the support. The support returns the first portion of the circular
buffer and the caller must make an additional call to retrieve the rest of
the circular buffer.


=== processState idle ===
== Field Access by Channel Access ==


This means that a new request is being made to process the record.
For V4 database access and channel access appear the same to record
The first step is to prepare the record.
instances.
* set newSeverity to noAlarm and newStatus to empty string.
It is only the code that implements link support that knows the difference.
** Is this really what we want? Perhaps just set severity and status?
If a linked record is local, database access is used, and, if the record
* What else?
is remote, channel access.


The next step is to obtain inputs for all input links in iocRecord.
V4 allows channel access to the following types of fields:
This may involve dbProcess being called multiple times if wait is specified
for one or more links.


After all input from iocRecord fields is complete, dbProcess calls
* primitive types
the record support process with state = idle.
* string
Record support sets state to one of inputActive, active,
* one dimensional array of primitive or string or struct
outputActive, or done. Each of these is discussed in greater
* struct with fields of following types:
detail below.
** primitive
** string
** struct
** array of primitive or string or struct


When record support return with state done, the ouput and process links
For other database field types, i.e. links, the database will make the field
in iocRecord are handled. This again may take several calls to dbProcess.
appear as one of the above types. For example a link field will appear
When all the output is processed the steps outlined in subsection
as a string with syntax that matches the information associated with the link.
done  below are performed. After this the record again becomes idle
For example a process link will have a string something like
and the record is ready to again start processing.
    support(processLink) ProcessLink(pvname = 'pvname'; wait = true)
where
; <tt>processLink</tt>
: selects the support for a process link
; <tt>ProcessLink</tt>
: Names the struct that the support uses for configuration information


The remaining subsections provide more details about each state. Keep in mind
that some actions are performed by dbProcess, some by iocRecord,
some by record support, and some by link support.


=== processState inputActive ===
<center>
= Record Processing Semantics =
</center>


This state means that one or more input links to other records have not
This section describes the semantics implemented by dbProcess.
completed. Links can be processed in parallel, sequencially, or a
combination of these. iocRecord handles the links in iocRecord and record
support handles record specific input links. The support is responsible for
implementing sequential or parallel link processing.
It calls link support to do the actual I/O. The Link support methods
provide options specifying if the linked record should be processed and
provide a callback to call when link processing completes. It is up to
iocRecord or record support to again call dbProcess when all input links
complete.


If is OK for dbProcess to be called multiple times while input links
The following are involved in record processing
are being processed. When iocRecord detects that all it's input
* dbProcess
links have completed, it sets state = active and returns.
** implements a queue for local records that are processed because of record links
dbProcess then sets state = idle and calls record support so
** posts monitors caused by field changes during record processing
that it starts processing it's input links.
* record support
** calls support code for RecordCommon fields
** is responsible for record instance fields
** calls link/struct support via interfaces implemented by the support
* link support
** can be links to other records, to driver support, etc
** implements interfaces called by record and/or other support
* struct support
** is responsible for the fields in the struct
** implements interfaces called by record and/or other support


=== processState active ===
== Processing Life Cycle ==
Assume a record instance is idle, i.e. is ready to start processing.
*dbProcess calls record support with one of the following states
** processCancel - record support must terminate any outstanding processing
** processStart - start processing. record support returns one of
*** processDone - All done and successful
*** processQuit - dont do any more processing. Return to idle state
*** processActive - not done. Call again
** processContinue - another request to process while record is active. Record support again returns one of the above.


This state means that record support and associated device support
Record support, with associated link/struct support does the following:
are waiting for something to complete, e.g. for a motor to reach
* When it is called for processStart
some position.
** calls the support for RecordCommon with state processStart. it returns
*** processDone - Record support starts processing record specific fields
*** processQuit - Record support just returns processQuit to dbProcess
*** processActive - Record returns processActive. It will be called again with state processContinue. It calls RecordCommon support with state processActive. This continues until Record Common returns processDone or processQuit
* When RecordCommon returns processDone record support starts processing record specific fields
** Associated link or struct support may be called
*** Record support implements any <tt>block</tt> fields.
*** It detects when asynchronous support completes
*** as long as there is incomplete asynchronous support it returns processActive to dbProcess
** When all record specific fields have been processed it calls RecordCommon suport with state processQuit
*** RecordCommon support can return processActive. Until it returns processDone, record support just returns processActive to dbProcess
** When RecordCommon returns processDone, record support returns processDone to dbProcess.


The record, however, can be processed so that it can sample
and report intermediate data values, e.g. the current motor position.
For example the record can be periodically scanned.


When record support detects that it is done, it sets the state to
struct and link fields can have associated support
either outputActive or done.
* associated support may be asynchronous
** support returns indicating that it is active
** support is required to detect when asynchronous support completes
** when processing is complete support returns indicating that it is done.
* whenever record support returns to dbProcess, dbProcess posts any fields that were modified.
** record may be active or done
* when record support returns processDone or processQuit record is again set idle.


=== processState outputActive ===


This state means that one or more output links to other records have not
completed. Links can be processed in parallel, sequencially, or a
combination of these.
Record support handles the record specific output links and then iocRecord
handles the output and process links in iocRecord.
When record support detects that all it's output links are done,
it returns with processState done. dbProcess then calls iocRecord which
starts processing it's output and process links.
Until it is done it sets processState to outputActive.
When it is done it sets the state to done.


== record common ==


=== processState done ===
These fields are optional but it is expected that most record
types will include a standard set of fields.


When both record support and iocRecord have reported that they are done,
The support for RecordCommon processes the following fields:
dbProcess does some final steps and then sets the state to idle.


The final steps are:
* at the beginning of record processing
** disabled - if true NO processing will be done, i.e. processQuit is returned
** scanDisable
*** has associated support
*** if record is scan disabled processQuit is returned
** alarm fields
*** alarm handling is described below
* after record support completes
** processLink array
*** has associated support


* If the request to process the record included a callback, the callback is called.
== record support ==
* A notification is issued that states that the record has completed
processing.
* The request to process a record can specify a callback that is called when the record completes processing. It a callback was specified, ,it is called.
* ???


Record support is responsible for all its fields.
For link and struct fields there may be associated support which
may be synchronous or asynchronous.
Record support communicates with
the link/struct support via interfaces that are implemented by the support.
If the record includes a field for struct(RecordCommon) it should
use the associated support for its fields.


----
Record support may be called multiple times by dbProcess while a record instance
<center>
is active.
== Alarm Processing ==
One of the arguments to process is ProcessState which has the values:
</center>
* processCancel - Cancel any outstanding activity
* processStart - Start processing
* processContinue - Making additional call


Are changes needed from the V3 model?
process returns ProcessReturn which is one of the following:
* processDone - Done and successful
* processQuit - Do not do any more processing
* processActive - Not done


Is it possible to do the following?
If record support returns processActive it must keep internal state so
that it knows how to handle processCancel and processContinue.


* When dbProcess is called with processState idle then the severity is set to noAlarm and the status to an empty string.
* Alarms can raised between the beginning of record processing and processState done. Like V3 if the new alarm has a greater severity than the current then the new alarm determines the severity and status.


----
For record support the above rules allow:
<center>
* process can be called repeatedly. This will continue as long as it returns processActive
== get/put database fields ==
* Everytime process returns processActive DbProcess posts monitors.
</center>


This section discusses how IOC database fields are accessed by channel access and also via database links.
== Record Locking ==


V3 implemented lock sets in order to prevent different threads
from simultaneously accessing linked records.


The semantics differ depending on the DbfType. Note that the discussion
Instead of lock sets V4:
of array and struct is saved until last.
* implements a per record instance lock.
=== primitive types ===
* defines a rule that allows two records to be locked without deadlocks


This includes DbfBool, DbfOctet, DbfInt16, ... , DbfFloat64.
== Posting Monitors ==
These do not present any problems. The scalar value is transfered.


=== string ===
In V3 monitors are posted when code (record support, device support, database access, etc) calls db_post_event. In V4 database access will itself handle
the posting of monitors.


A string is just a UTF_8 encoded character string
Monitors are posted by DbProcess when
* record support returns processActive.
* at the end of record processing.


=== DbfMenu ===
<center>
= link/struct Semantics =
</center>


The index value is handled just like int16.
Both link and struct fields can have associated support.
Since the choices for a menu can't change, only the changes to the index
The support can be synchronous or asynchronous.
can occur.


=== DbfEnum ===
Support code implements interfaces.
Code that is responsible for a field communicates with the support via
the interface. Lets call this code the client.


The index value is handled just like DbfInt16.
Each link and struct field has a well defined client.
* The support for RecordCommon is the client for fields in dbCommon
* record support is the client for the other top level fields in a record
* the struct support is the client for any link or struct fields in the struct


The choices are handled as an array of strings. See array below for details.
A link/struct may have an associated block. The client is responsible for
implementing block. If block is true then the support will not be called
until all outstanding record activity completes.


=== DbfLink and DbfDevice ===
<center>
= channelAccess links =
</center>


Both of these have the following:
channelAccess link means access to a record or field. The requester can be:
* A database link in a record
* A channel access link in a record
* A workstation channel access client


* <tt>choiceName</tt> A string that selects the link or device support.
A channelAccess link is one of the following types:
* <tt>dataStruct</tt> Each support has an associated struct for configuration.
* Monitor Link
** Implemented via a monitor request on linked field
** Optionally process record containing the link when monitor value is returned.
* Input Link
** Optionally request that record be processed.
** Optionally wait for linked record to complete processing.
** Get value.
* Output Link:
** Put value
** Optionally request processing.
** Optionally wait until completion
* Process Link: Perform the following actions
** Request processing
** Optionally wait until linked record completes


How should the be made available? Perhaps:
NOTES:
* processLink is the replacement for the V3 forwardLink
* wait does NOT mean to wait synchronously. It means to save state, return, and resume at the saved state when called again.


The field appears as a string with the following syntax:
Links are processed as follows:


choiceName(structAssignmentList)
The following rules apply when a process request is made:
* If record is already being processed the request is just ignored
* record support can specify that links to particular fields not cause processing.
** Where should this be specified?  In the Database Definition, the record instance, or both.
** If a process request is allowed, should it be done regardless of the scan mechanism, i.e. the record does not have to be passive?


where structAssignmentList has the same syntax as defined in "V4 DB Record Instance Syntax"


=== MDArray ===
----
<center>
= Mutual Exclusion =
</center>


TBD
V3 implemented lock sets, i.e. when a record was being processed it and all records linked via database links were locked.


=== timeStamp ===
Lock sets solved two Mutual Exclusion problems:
* V3 allowed dbProcess to be called recursively.
** process passive database links and forward links were implemented via recursive calls to DbProcess
** Lock sets prevented deadly embrace problems for circular links.
* No puts could be done to a record in a lock set while record processing is active.
** For synchronous records this guarantees that no fields are modified except by record processing itself.
** For asynchronous records this guarantee is not valid.


This is just transfered a a struct with two fields:
* int64 secondsSinceEpoch
* int32 nanoSeconds


=== struct ===
V4 does not call dbProcess recursively. Instead a process request is queued.
The request fails if either of the following is true:
* The record is active.
* The record is already queued.


The database definition syntax allow a struct to be composed of fields
dbProcess itself manages the queue , which is FIFO.
of any DbfType. How should this be made available to clients?
When record support returns the first entry in the queue is processed.
In addition if link or struct support completes before the queue
is empty, a request to process the record containing the link/struct will
be added to the same queue.
Thus if a set of synchronous records are processed they will complete processing
without any context switch.


The individual fields can be accessed directly so this discussion
<b>Question</b> What about periodically scanned records? Needs thought.
only involves access to the entire structure atomically.


Perhaps two forms of access should be made available:
This leaves the question of what should be done about mutual exclusion.


# Access by clients that have knowledge of the structure
For V4 there will be two locks associated with the IOC database:
# Access by clients that do not know about the structure
1) a global lock, and 2) A per record instance lock.


==== structure access ====
The global lock must be taken
whenever the structure of the database is modified. Examples are
1) adding new record types, 2) adding new record instances, and 3) modifying
database links. Global locks are not discussed further in this document.


This access will only be implemented if all fields types are either
Each record instance has an associated lock.
primitive or string. In this case the data is transfered as a sequence
When dbProcess is called it takes the lock.
of field values.
Before it returns it unlocks.
Thus record support does not need to lock or unlock.


==== non-structure access ====
Other code that needs access to fields of a record instance must
lock before accessing any fields and unlock after all accesses are complete.


The structure value is presented as a string that has the same syntax
This leaves the problem of how to access fields from two different record
as structAssignmentList as defined in "V4 DB Record Instance Syntax"
instances simultaneously. For example code that implements database
access needs such access. Code that needs such access must call dbLockLink before accessing the linked record and dbUnlockLink after access.


dbLockLink is implemented as follows:
* Each Record instances has a unique ordinal number
* Assume Record X has a link to record Y
* If the ordinal number of X is less than that of Y
** Just call dbLock for record Y
* If the ordinal numnber of X is greater than that of Y
** call dbUnlock for X
** call dbLock for Y
** call dbLock for X


=== array ===
----
<center>
= Posting Modifications =
</center>


There are two major issues:
The document "V4 Design: dbdIterfaces" provides a design that allows
database access to handle all posting on monitors without requiring
any help from the code that modifies database fields.
It can do this because fields can be modified only via an
interface implemented by database access.


# memory
dbProcess posts monitors when:
# data type
* When record support returns processActive.
* When it finishes record processing.


==== memory ====
How to implement monitors must be decided.


Database Access is implemented so that record/link/device support can
----
transfer an array in segments. Two example are:
<center>
 
= Alarm Processing =
* If the array is a circular buffer, it is presented in two segements
</center>
* If the array is stored in hardware, e.g. a transient recorder, the array can be read from the hardware and passed to the client in segments.
 
==== data types ====
 
The database definition syntax allow an array to be any of the basic types,
i.e. DbfBool,...,DbfFloat64, DbfString, DbfArray, DbfStruct.
 
For primitive types, the data should be passed as a sequence of scalar values.
Question? Should it be possible to pass a subarray, i.e. offset, length?
 
For DbfString it should also be possible to pass that array as a sequence
of string values.


What about DbfArray?
<b>Question</b> Will V4 alarm handling be different than V3? If so this section
Perhaps this should not be supported?
may be meaningless.


What about DbfStruct?
The V4 semantics for status and severity have the following goals:
* alarmSeverity has the same values as for V3
* alarmStatus is a string
* a record starts processing with alarmSeverity = "NO_ALARM" and status empty.
* status will ONLY be posted if it has changed since the last time it was posted.
* alarmSeverity will ONLY be posted if it has changed since the last time it was posted


=== Associated Data ===
The semantics, which are implemented by the support for RecordCommon, are:


The typical example is a client that asks for timeStamp, severity, status,
* When recordCommon is called with processStart
and data.
** A private variable newSeverity is set to NO_ALARM
** A private variable prevSeverity is set to alarmSeverity
* When recordCommon completes its part of record processing
** If newSeverity is NO_ALARM and prevSeverity has a different value
*** alarmSeverity is set to NO_ALARM
*** alarmStatus is set to empty


Perhaps these can be handled as four synchronized requests to the same record.
* When the recordCommon.setSeverity(sevr,status) is called
 
** If sevr is less than or equal to newSeverity nothing is done
How is this implemented?
** else
 
*** alarmSeverity is set to sevr
* What does dbProcess do?
*** alarmStatus is set to status
* How does a client make the request
*** newSeverity is set to sevr


NOTE: alarmStatus and alarmSeverity are written by the normal method.
This means that their values will be posted.
----
----
<center>
<center>
== Posting Modifications ==
= Channel Access/ Database Access field types =
  </center>
  </center>


The document "V4 Design: dbdIterfaces" provides a design that
allows dbAccess to detect all changes to fields of an IOC record.


Hopefully dbAccess can handle all posting on monitors without requiring
== Overview ==
any help from code that modifies database fields. Instead, when
dbAccess detects a modification it handles the monitors.


This section discusses how IOC database fields are accessed by channel access
or via database links.


The following is the initial attempt to describe how monitors are handled.
For the initial V4 implementation only the following types of data
The following definitions are used:
will be accessable.
* monitor - A client has asked to be notified when a field value changes.
* post - Create storage, copy the current value of the field into the storage, and pass the storage to the monitor subsystem.


* primitive types
* string
* enum
* one dimensional array of primitive or string or struct
* struct with fields of following types:
** primitive
** string
** enum
** struct (use recursion for allowed types)
** one dimensional array of primitive or string or struct


Database fields are either
The dbdInterfaces document defines database field types.
* static - These fields change only because something external to the record modifies the field.
It also defines a subset called basic types, which consists
* dynamic - These are fields that change because of record processing.
of primitive types, string, array, and structure.
For external access only basic types can be accessed.
This means that structures and arrays that do not consist of basic types
are not accessablevia clannelAccess. For example a DbfLink is
not accessable via channel access as a DbfLink.


Each type has different semantics for monitors.
Non basic fields will only be available via some combination of basic types.


=== static fields ===
For example a DbfLink field will appear as a string.
If a Database Definition is


The semantics differ depending on the DbfType.
    struct(calcInpLink) {
        field(block,boolean)
        field(link,link)
        field(value,float64)
    };
   
    record(xxx) {
        field(link,link)
        field(value,float64)
    ...
        field(inp,array(struct(calcInpLink)[]))
    ...
    }


==== primitive types ====
If a client attaches to
    record.field(link)
The data will be appear in the form:
    choice(choiceName) SupportStruct(pvname= ...)
where <tt>choiceName</tt> is the name of the link support, <tt>SupportStruct</tt> is the name of the support struct asociated with the support, and the arguments are the values for the support structure.


This includes DbfBool, DbfOctet, DbfInt16, ..., DbfFloat64
Then if a client specifies the process variable:
When a static primitive field is modified, a monitor is immediately posted.
    record.field(inp[1].link)
Then it connects to the link field of the second calcInpLink of field inp.


==== DbfMenu ====


Whenever the index is modified, a monitor is immediately posted.
== primitive types ==


Since the choices for a menu can't change, only the changes to the index
This includes DbfBool, DbfOctet, DbfInt16, ... , DbfFloat64.
can occur.
These do not present any problems. The scalar value is transfered.


==== DbfEnum ====
== string ==


Whenever the index is modified, a monitor is immediately posted.
A string is just a UTF_8 encoded character string


What about when a choice changes?
== DbfMenu and DbfEnum ==
* Should only the choice that changes be posted? If so what is the syntax?
* Should the complete new set of choices be posted?
* Should the user just be notified that one or more choices changed and the user must issue a new read request?


==== DbfLink and DbfDevice ====
Handled as an enum


Both of these have the following:


* <tt>choiceName</tt> A string that selects the link or device support.
== DbfLink ==
* <tt>dataStruct</tt> Each support has an associated struct for configuration.


What should be made available?
A string with the same syntax as defined for a link field in "V4 DB Record Instance Syntax"


== timeStamp ==


==== string ====
This is just transfered like a struct with two fields:
* int64 secondsSinceEpoch
* int32 nanoSeconds


When a static string field is modified, a monitor is immediately posted.


Is this correct? For long strings it could cause excessive amounts of
== struct ==
memory to be consumed. Probably not a big problem.


==== array ====
The individual fields can be accessed directly so this discussion
only involves access to the entire structure.


Now memory becomes a big issue. Perhaps the following semantics could
The entire structure can be accessed as a string with the same syntax
be used.
as defined for a struct field in "V4 DB Record Instance Syntax"
* The array is posted when the value changes.
* When the value changes, the client is notified and must issue a read request to retrieve the data.


Should both or only one be supported?


If both who decides which semantics to use?
== array ==
# client?
# database developer?
# ???


==== struct ====
Arrays of the following types are accessable:
* primitive - DbfBool,...,DbfFloat64
* DbfString
* DbfStruct - As long as its fields are valid types


Since structures can contain fields of any DbfType
Note that arrays of structs are not accessable in the early V4 releases.


=== dynamic fields ===
Arrays still need lots more discussion!!!
The database definition syntax allow an array to be any of the basic types, i.e. DbfBool,...,DbfFloat64, DbfString, DbfArray, DbfStruct.


For each dynamic database field, dbAccess keeps an associated bit
For the initial V4 version, database access only allows access to arrays of the following types.
that is set to 0 when the record starts processing and is set to 1
* primitive - DbfBool,...,DbfFloat64
whenever the field is modified.
* DbfString
* ???? What else


Whenever record support returns with processState active or iocRecord
An individual element of an array of type DbfStruct can be accessed
returns with processState done, then the following is done:
directly if it satisfies the criteria for accessing a DbfStruct.


* The monitor subsystem is notified about the beginning of synchronized monitors.
Question: Should database Access be implemented so that record/link support can transfer an array in segments. Examples:
* Each field with the associated bit set to 1 is posted.
* If the array is a circular buffer, it is presented in two segements
* The associated bit is set back to 0.
* If the array is stored in hardware, e.g. a transient recorder, the array can be read from the hardware and passed to the client in segments.
* Since status, severity, and timeStamp are dynamic fields in iocRecord, they follow the same logic.
* The monitor subsystem is notified about the end of synchronized monitors.


Separate discussions are required for the following: 1) primitive fields,
If an array is available only in segments then can we
2) string fields, 3) structured fields, and  4) array fields.
prevent two clients from trying to access the same array simultaneously?
Each is discussed in a separate subsection.


==== primitive fields ====
Perhaps this is a problem that must be solved by an application:
* runControl records are one solution
* Other solutions can be envisioned


No problems.


==== string fields ====
== MDArray ==


Memory is an issue. Should there be a way to postpone posting until
Not implemented if the early V4 releases.
the monitor is ready to retrieve the value? If so who decides?


==== structured fields ====
== Associated Data ==


Memory is again an issue. Structure with only primitive fields should
The typical example is a client that asks for timeStamp, severity, status,
be posted immediately but perhaps complicated structures should not be.
and data.
Who decides? How?
 
==== array fields ====
 
It should be possible to post small arrays of primitive type. Large arrays
should not be posted until monitor system is ready to accept the data. It should also be possible to just notify the client that the array changed but the client must issue a read request to retrieve the data.

Latest revision as of 19:52, 2 November 2005

EPICS V4: Record Processing November 02 2005


Overview

UNRESOLVED ISSUES

  • This document is still evolving
  • Monitors
    • How will monitor data be managed?
    • Big problem is how will array data be managed?
  • Alarms
    • How will V4 handle alarms?
  • Events
    • What is the V4 event model?
    • What is required from the IOC database?

This document described semantics for V4 record processing that are different than for V3. This includes the following:

  • Semantics for record processing
  • Semantics for Database and Channel Access Links.
  • Record Locking
  • Posting database monitors
  • Status and Alarm Severity
  • Access to array and structure fields.

This version is based on feedback from the EPICS core developer's meeting at ANL/APS on July 11th through July 14th. In addition discussions with Andrew Johnson and Eric Norum have led to many of the ideas described below. This wiki is a companion to the wiki "V4 Design: dbdInterfaces".

V3 record processing semantics do not work well for data acquisition applications. An example of data acquisition is:

  • Move sample to new position.
    • Several motors may be involved
    • While moving post monitors to show current position, etc.
  • Sample data
  • Wait until CA client has fetched the data before next move.

SynAPPS provides the Scan, motor, etc records which help with data processing applications. These records process as follows:

  • Record does not complete processing until all inputs, outputs, etc done. Not completing means that they do not call recGblFwdLink until all proccessing is complete. Note that recGblFwdLink is what causes the V3 ioc to complete record processing.
  • While waiting for asynchronous events these records have PACT=0 but keep state that shows it is still active
  • Can be scanned and issue monitors while internal state is active

Leaving PACT 0 but not calling recGblFwdLink was not anticipated when the V3 record processing semantics were created. For V4 a record can be processed while it is waiting for asynchronous processing to complete.

In V3, if an input link is asynchronous, Process Passive does not wait for asynchronous processing to complete before fetching data. This also complicated data acquisition applications.

V4 record processing is designed to make data acquisition easier. Both input and output links can wait for record processing. This is done, however, without record support blocking. If blocking makes it easier to implement record support, then the support can spawn a separate thread that does block. Record support can communicate with the separate thread to decide when to complete record processing.


Overview of V4 Record Processing

V4 will provide a replacement for dbProcess. The name may be different but for now it will still be called dbProcess.

In V4 database access and channel access appear the same to record and link support. Only the implementation knows the difference. In this document the term channelAccess will mean access to a record. Thus it can mean a workstation client or a field of a record that is a link to a record.

V4 also allows support for struct fields. For example base provides support for

    field(common,struct(RecordCommon))

In the record types provided with base, this is the first field. The fields in RecordCommon are the V4 replacement for the V3 dbCommon fields.


V4 record processing has the following features.

  • database fields
    • "owned" by database not record support
    • fields can only be accessed via interfaces
    • support can optionally provide storage for data associated with a field
    • for channelAccess all fields appear as type primitive, string, struct, array or combination thereof
  • dbProcess
    • processes synchronous linked records by queuing requests rather than recursive calls to dbProcess
    • can be called an arbitrary number of times while record is active
  • link
    • always has associated support
    • can be record link or can be something else, e.g. a link to hardware
  • record link
    • can request process and/or wait for asynchronous completion
    • local synchronous requests queued by dbProcess
    • record is active and can be processed while asynchronous links active
  • struct fields
    • Can have associated support which can be synchronous or asynchronous
  • block
    • is requested via a separate field
    • if true than support waits for all outstanding I/O to complete before further processing
    • if false than asynchronous support can proceed in parallel
  • lock
    • record instances are locked
    • dbProcess locks before calling support
    • other code can also lock
    • Two records can be locked without deadlock
  • monitors
    • dbProcess handles monitors
    • support triggers monitors by writing to fields


Database Fields

Field Access by Support Code

Support code can access database fields only via interfaces implemented by the IOC database. Thus record fields are owned by the IOC database not by record support.

Support code can register to provide storage for particular fields. For example support code could implement a circular buffer for field value. When some other code request the array associated with value, the IOC database calls the support. The support returns the first portion of the circular buffer and the caller must make an additional call to retrieve the rest of the circular buffer.

Field Access by Channel Access

For V4 database access and channel access appear the same to record instances. It is only the code that implements link support that knows the difference. If a linked record is local, database access is used, and, if the record is remote, channel access.

V4 allows channel access to the following types of fields:

  • primitive types
  • string
  • one dimensional array of primitive or string or struct
  • struct with fields of following types:
    • primitive
    • string
    • struct
    • array of primitive or string or struct

For other database field types, i.e. links, the database will make the field appear as one of the above types. For example a link field will appear as a string with syntax that matches the information associated with the link. For example a process link will have a string something like

   support(processLink) ProcessLink(pvname = 'pvname'; wait = true)

where

processLink
selects the support for a process link
ProcessLink
Names the struct that the support uses for configuration information


Record Processing Semantics

This section describes the semantics implemented by dbProcess.

The following are involved in record processing

  • dbProcess
    • implements a queue for local records that are processed because of record links
    • posts monitors caused by field changes during record processing
  • record support
    • calls support code for RecordCommon fields
    • is responsible for record instance fields
    • calls link/struct support via interfaces implemented by the support
  • link support
    • can be links to other records, to driver support, etc
    • implements interfaces called by record and/or other support
  • struct support
    • is responsible for the fields in the struct
    • implements interfaces called by record and/or other support

Processing Life Cycle

Assume a record instance is idle, i.e. is ready to start processing.

  • dbProcess calls record support with one of the following states
    • processCancel - record support must terminate any outstanding processing
    • processStart - start processing. record support returns one of
      • processDone - All done and successful
      • processQuit - dont do any more processing. Return to idle state
      • processActive - not done. Call again
    • processContinue - another request to process while record is active. Record support again returns one of the above.

Record support, with associated link/struct support does the following:

  • When it is called for processStart
    • calls the support for RecordCommon with state processStart. it returns
      • processDone - Record support starts processing record specific fields
      • processQuit - Record support just returns processQuit to dbProcess
      • processActive - Record returns processActive. It will be called again with state processContinue. It calls RecordCommon support with state processActive. This continues until Record Common returns processDone or processQuit
  • When RecordCommon returns processDone record support starts processing record specific fields
    • Associated link or struct support may be called
      • Record support implements any block fields.
      • It detects when asynchronous support completes
      • as long as there is incomplete asynchronous support it returns processActive to dbProcess
    • When all record specific fields have been processed it calls RecordCommon suport with state processQuit
      • RecordCommon support can return processActive. Until it returns processDone, record support just returns processActive to dbProcess
    • When RecordCommon returns processDone, record support returns processDone to dbProcess.


struct and link fields can have associated support

  • associated support may be asynchronous
    • support returns indicating that it is active
    • support is required to detect when asynchronous support completes
    • when processing is complete support returns indicating that it is done.
  • whenever record support returns to dbProcess, dbProcess posts any fields that were modified.
    • record may be active or done
  • when record support returns processDone or processQuit record is again set idle.


record common

These fields are optional but it is expected that most record types will include a standard set of fields.

The support for RecordCommon processes the following fields:

  • at the beginning of record processing
    • disabled - if true NO processing will be done, i.e. processQuit is returned
    • scanDisable
      • has associated support
      • if record is scan disabled processQuit is returned
    • alarm fields
      • alarm handling is described below
  • after record support completes
    • processLink array
      • has associated support

record support

Record support is responsible for all its fields. For link and struct fields there may be associated support which may be synchronous or asynchronous. Record support communicates with the link/struct support via interfaces that are implemented by the support. If the record includes a field for struct(RecordCommon) it should use the associated support for its fields.

Record support may be called multiple times by dbProcess while a record instance is active. One of the arguments to process is ProcessState which has the values:

  • processCancel - Cancel any outstanding activity
  • processStart - Start processing
  • processContinue - Making additional call

process returns ProcessReturn which is one of the following:

  • processDone - Done and successful
  • processQuit - Do not do any more processing
  • processActive - Not done

If record support returns processActive it must keep internal state so that it knows how to handle processCancel and processContinue.


For record support the above rules allow:

  • process can be called repeatedly. This will continue as long as it returns processActive
  • Everytime process returns processActive DbProcess posts monitors.

Record Locking

V3 implemented lock sets in order to prevent different threads from simultaneously accessing linked records.

Instead of lock sets V4:

  • implements a per record instance lock.
  • defines a rule that allows two records to be locked without deadlocks

Posting Monitors

In V3 monitors are posted when code (record support, device support, database access, etc) calls db_post_event. In V4 database access will itself handle the posting of monitors.

Monitors are posted by DbProcess when

  • record support returns processActive.
  • at the end of record processing.

link/struct Semantics

Both link and struct fields can have associated support. The support can be synchronous or asynchronous.

Support code implements interfaces. Code that is responsible for a field communicates with the support via the interface. Lets call this code the client.

Each link and struct field has a well defined client.

  • The support for RecordCommon is the client for fields in dbCommon
  • record support is the client for the other top level fields in a record
  • the struct support is the client for any link or struct fields in the struct

A link/struct may have an associated block. The client is responsible for implementing block. If block is true then the support will not be called until all outstanding record activity completes.

channelAccess links

channelAccess link means access to a record or field. The requester can be:

  • A database link in a record
  • A channel access link in a record
  • A workstation channel access client

A channelAccess link is one of the following types:

  • Monitor Link
    • Implemented via a monitor request on linked field
    • Optionally process record containing the link when monitor value is returned.
  • Input Link
    • Optionally request that record be processed.
    • Optionally wait for linked record to complete processing.
    • Get value.
  • Output Link:
    • Put value
    • Optionally request processing.
    • Optionally wait until completion
  • Process Link: Perform the following actions
    • Request processing
    • Optionally wait until linked record completes

NOTES:

  • processLink is the replacement for the V3 forwardLink
  • wait does NOT mean to wait synchronously. It means to save state, return, and resume at the saved state when called again.

Links are processed as follows:

The following rules apply when a process request is made:

  • If record is already being processed the request is just ignored
  • record support can specify that links to particular fields not cause processing.
    • Where should this be specified? In the Database Definition, the record instance, or both.
    • If a process request is allowed, should it be done regardless of the scan mechanism, i.e. the record does not have to be passive?



Mutual Exclusion

V3 implemented lock sets, i.e. when a record was being processed it and all records linked via database links were locked.

Lock sets solved two Mutual Exclusion problems:

  • V3 allowed dbProcess to be called recursively.
    • process passive database links and forward links were implemented via recursive calls to DbProcess
    • Lock sets prevented deadly embrace problems for circular links.
  • No puts could be done to a record in a lock set while record processing is active.
    • For synchronous records this guarantees that no fields are modified except by record processing itself.
    • For asynchronous records this guarantee is not valid.


V4 does not call dbProcess recursively. Instead a process request is queued. The request fails if either of the following is true:

  • The record is active.
  • The record is already queued.

dbProcess itself manages the queue , which is FIFO. When record support returns the first entry in the queue is processed. In addition if link or struct support completes before the queue is empty, a request to process the record containing the link/struct will be added to the same queue. Thus if a set of synchronous records are processed they will complete processing without any context switch.

Question What about periodically scanned records? Needs thought.

This leaves the question of what should be done about mutual exclusion.

For V4 there will be two locks associated with the IOC database: 1) a global lock, and 2) A per record instance lock.

The global lock must be taken whenever the structure of the database is modified. Examples are 1) adding new record types, 2) adding new record instances, and 3) modifying database links. Global locks are not discussed further in this document.

Each record instance has an associated lock. When dbProcess is called it takes the lock. Before it returns it unlocks. Thus record support does not need to lock or unlock.

Other code that needs access to fields of a record instance must lock before accessing any fields and unlock after all accesses are complete.

This leaves the problem of how to access fields from two different record instances simultaneously. For example code that implements database access needs such access. Code that needs such access must call dbLockLink before accessing the linked record and dbUnlockLink after access.

dbLockLink is implemented as follows:

  • Each Record instances has a unique ordinal number
  • Assume Record X has a link to record Y
  • If the ordinal number of X is less than that of Y
    • Just call dbLock for record Y
  • If the ordinal numnber of X is greater than that of Y
    • call dbUnlock for X
    • call dbLock for Y
    • call dbLock for X

Posting Modifications

The document "V4 Design: dbdIterfaces" provides a design that allows database access to handle all posting on monitors without requiring any help from the code that modifies database fields. It can do this because fields can be modified only via an interface implemented by database access.

dbProcess posts monitors when:

  • When record support returns processActive.
  • When it finishes record processing.

How to implement monitors must be decided.


Alarm Processing

Question Will V4 alarm handling be different than V3? If so this section may be meaningless.

The V4 semantics for status and severity have the following goals:

  • alarmSeverity has the same values as for V3
  • alarmStatus is a string
  • a record starts processing with alarmSeverity = "NO_ALARM" and status empty.
  • status will ONLY be posted if it has changed since the last time it was posted.
  • alarmSeverity will ONLY be posted if it has changed since the last time it was posted

The semantics, which are implemented by the support for RecordCommon, are:

  • When recordCommon is called with processStart
    • A private variable newSeverity is set to NO_ALARM
    • A private variable prevSeverity is set to alarmSeverity
  • When recordCommon completes its part of record processing
    • If newSeverity is NO_ALARM and prevSeverity has a different value
      • alarmSeverity is set to NO_ALARM
      • alarmStatus is set to empty
  • When the recordCommon.setSeverity(sevr,status) is called
    • If sevr is less than or equal to newSeverity nothing is done
    • else
      • alarmSeverity is set to sevr
      • alarmStatus is set to status
      • newSeverity is set to sevr

NOTE: alarmStatus and alarmSeverity are written by the normal method. This means that their values will be posted.


Channel Access/ Database Access field types


Overview

This section discusses how IOC database fields are accessed by channel access or via database links.

For the initial V4 implementation only the following types of data will be accessable.

  • primitive types
  • string
  • enum
  • one dimensional array of primitive or string or struct
  • struct with fields of following types:
    • primitive
    • string
    • enum
    • struct (use recursion for allowed types)
    • one dimensional array of primitive or string or struct

The dbdInterfaces document defines database field types. It also defines a subset called basic types, which consists of primitive types, string, array, and structure. For external access only basic types can be accessed. This means that structures and arrays that do not consist of basic types are not accessablevia clannelAccess. For example a DbfLink is not accessable via channel access as a DbfLink.

Non basic fields will only be available via some combination of basic types.

For example a DbfLink field will appear as a string. If a Database Definition is

    struct(calcInpLink) {
        field(block,boolean)
        field(link,link)
        field(value,float64)
    };
    
    record(xxx) {
        field(link,link)
        field(value,float64)
    ...
        field(inp,array(struct(calcInpLink)[]))
    ...
    }

If a client attaches to

    record.field(link)

The data will be appear in the form:

    choice(choiceName) SupportStruct(pvname= ...)

where choiceName is the name of the link support, SupportStruct is the name of the support struct asociated with the support, and the arguments are the values for the support structure.

Then if a client specifies the process variable:

    record.field(inp[1].link)

Then it connects to the link field of the second calcInpLink of field inp.


primitive types

This includes DbfBool, DbfOctet, DbfInt16, ... , DbfFloat64. These do not present any problems. The scalar value is transfered.

string

A string is just a UTF_8 encoded character string

DbfMenu and DbfEnum

Handled as an enum


DbfLink

A string with the same syntax as defined for a link field in "V4 DB Record Instance Syntax"

timeStamp

This is just transfered like a struct with two fields:

  • int64 secondsSinceEpoch
  • int32 nanoSeconds


struct

The individual fields can be accessed directly so this discussion only involves access to the entire structure.

The entire structure can be accessed as a string with the same syntax as defined for a struct field in "V4 DB Record Instance Syntax"


array

Arrays of the following types are accessable:

  • primitive - DbfBool,...,DbfFloat64
  • DbfString
  • DbfStruct - As long as its fields are valid types

Note that arrays of structs are not accessable in the early V4 releases.

Arrays still need lots more discussion!!! The database definition syntax allow an array to be any of the basic types, i.e. DbfBool,...,DbfFloat64, DbfString, DbfArray, DbfStruct.

For the initial V4 version, database access only allows access to arrays of the following types.

  • primitive - DbfBool,...,DbfFloat64
  • DbfString
  • ???? What else

An individual element of an array of type DbfStruct can be accessed directly if it satisfies the criteria for accessing a DbfStruct.

Question: Should database Access be implemented so that record/link support can transfer an array in segments. Examples:

  • If the array is a circular buffer, it is presented in two segements
  • If the array is stored in hardware, e.g. a transient recorder, the array can be read from the hardware and passed to the client in segments.

If an array is available only in segments then can we prevent two clients from trying to access the same array simultaneously?

Perhaps this is a problem that must be solved by an application:

  • runControl records are one solution
  • Other solutions can be envisioned


MDArray

Not implemented if the early V4 releases.

Associated Data

The typical example is a client that asks for timeStamp, severity, status, and data.