Difference between revisions of "V4 Design: Record Processing"

From EPICSWIKI
 
(10 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
= EPICS V4: Record Processing =
EPICS V4: Record Processing November 02 2005  
August 23 2005  


----
----


<center>
= Overview =
== Overview ==
 
</center>
<b>UNRESOLVED ISSUES</b>
* This document is still evolving
* Monitors
** How will monitor data be managed?
** Big problem is how will array data be managed?
* Alarms
** How will V4 handle alarms?
* Events
** What is the V4 event model?
** What is required from the IOC database?


This document described the semantics for V4 record processing.
This document described semantics for V4 record processing that are
different than for V3.
This includes the following:
This includes the following:
* Semantics for record processing
* Semantics for Database and Channel Access Links.
* Semantics for Database and Channel Access Links.
* Semantics for record processing
* Record Locking
* Record Locking
* Posting database monitors
* Posting database monitors
Line 19: Line 28:
This version is based on feedback from the EPICS core developer's
This version is based on feedback from the EPICS core developer's
meeting at ANL/APS on July 11th through July 14th.
meeting at ANL/APS on July 11th through July 14th.
It is also a companion to the V4 Design: dbdInterfaces wiki.
In addition discussions with Andrew Johnson and Eric Norum have
led to many of the ideas described below.
This wiki is a companion to the wiki "V4 Design: dbdInterfaces".


The main motive for the V4 semantics related to record and link processing is
V3 record processing semantics do not work well for data
that the V3 record processing semantics do not work well for data
acquisition applications. An example of data acquisition is:
acquisition applications. An example of data acquisition is:
*  Move sample to new position.
*  Move sample to new position.
Line 38: Line 48:


Leaving PACT 0 but not calling recGblFwdLink was not anticipated when the V3 record processing semantics were created.
Leaving PACT 0 but not calling recGblFwdLink was not anticipated when the V3 record processing semantics were created.
For V4 it must be posssible for a record to be processed while it is waiting
For V4 a record can be processed while it is waiting
for asynchronous processing to complete.
for asynchronous processing to complete.


Line 47: Line 57:
V4 record processing is designed to make data acquisition easier.
V4 record processing is designed to make data acquisition easier.
Both input and output links can wait for record processing.
Both input and output links can wait for record processing.
This must be done, however, without record support blocking.
This is done, however, without record support blocking.
If blocking makes it easier to implement record support,
If blocking makes it easier to implement record support,
then the support can spawn a separate thread that does block.
then the support can spawn a separate thread that does block.
Line 56: Line 66:


<center>
<center>
== Goals for V4 Record Processing ==
= Overview of V4 Record Processing =
  </center>
  </center>


V4 record processing has the following features not available in V3:
V4 will provide a replacement for dbProcess.
The name may be different but for now it will still be called dbProcess.


*All links to other records:
In V4 database access and channel access appear the same to record and
** Can request that the linked record be processed.
link support.
** Can wait until the linked record completes processing
Only the implementation knows the difference.
* Database links are not processed via recursive calls to dbProcess
In this document the term channelAccess will mean access to a record.
* Lock sets do not exist. Instead each record instance has a lock.
Thus it can mean a workstation client or a field of
* Monitors are implemented by database access without requiring calls to post monitors.
a record that is a link to a record.
* Channel Access and Database Access can access arrays and structures


=== V4 Link Semantics ===
V4 also allows support for <b>struct</b> fields.
For example base provides support for
    field(common,struct(RecordCommon))
In the record types provided with base, this is the first field.
The fields in <tt>RecordCommon</tt> are the V4 replacement for
the V3 dbCommon fields.


NOTES:
*Instead of "forward link" the name "process link" is used.
*Unless stated otherwise, the features described in this section apply to both database and channel access links.


Links are processed as follows:
V4 record processing has the following features.


* Input Link from another record
* database fields
** Optionally request that record be processed.
** "owned" by database not record support
** Optionally wait for record to complete processing.
** fields can only be accessed via interfaces
** Get value.
** support can optionally provide storage for data associated with a field
** When a record has multiple input links the links can be processed in parallel or sequentially
** for channelAccess all fields appear as type primitive, string, struct, array or combination thereof
* Output Link to another record
* dbProcess
** Put value
** processes synchronous linked records by queuing requests rather than recursive calls to dbProcess
** Optionally request that the record be processed.
** can be called an arbitrary number of times while record is active
*** For database links, if the record is already active or already queued for processing the link request fails.
* link
*** What about channel access links? Perhaps they should also fail.
** always has associated support
** Optionally wait until record completes processing.
** can be record link or can be something else, e.g. a link to hardware
** When a record has multiple output links the links can be processed in parallel or sequentially
* record link
* Process Link
** can request process and/or wait for asynchronous completion
** request processing
** local synchronous requests queued by dbProcess
** Optionally wait until record completes processing.
** record is active and can be processed while asynchronous links active
** When a record has multiple output links the links can be processed in parallel or sequentially
* struct fields
** Can have associated support which can be synchronous or asynchronous
* block
** is requested via a separate field
** if true than support waits for all outstanding I/O to complete before further processing
** if false than asynchronous support can proceed in parallel
* lock
** record instances are locked
** dbProcess locks before calling support
** other code can also lock
** Two records can be locked without deadlock
* monitors
** dbProcess handles monitors
** support triggers monitors by writing to fields


The following rules are for links which request processing.


* If record is already being processed the request is ignored.
<center>
** Should the record containing the link have a warning message?
= Database Fields =
* Can a record declare that links to particular fields not cause processing?
</center>
** If yes than this should be declared by a record instance
== Field Access by Support Code ==
** If yes than record containing link should have warning message
Support code can access database fields only via interfaces implemented by
* Can a record declare that it can not be processed via process links?
the IOC database.
** If yes than this should be declared by a record instance
Thus record fields are owned by the IOC database not by record support.
** If yes than record containing link should have warning message
 
NOTE: wait does NOT mean to block. It means to save state, return,
and resume at the saved state when called again.
 
=== Processing V4 Database Links ===
 
In V3 record linked via database links are processed via recursive calls to
dbProcess. In V4 this will no longer be done. For V4 the following is done
when a link requests processing:


# If the record is active or already queued the request is ignored. Should the requester receive an error?
Support code can register to provide storage for particular fields.
# If the record does not allow link requests to cause processing the request fails.
For example support code could implement a circular buffer for field <tt>value</tt>.
# If neither 1) or 2) are true than the record is queued for processing.
When some other code
request the array associated with <tt>value</tt>, the IOC database
calls the support. The support returns the first portion of the circular
buffer and the caller must make an additional call to retrieve the rest of
the circular buffer.


Question. Should these same rules apply to Channel Access Links?
== Field Access by Channel Access ==


=== Record Locking ===
For V4 database access and channel access appear the same to record
instances.
It is only the code that implements link support that knows the difference.
If a linked record is local, database access is used, and, if the record
is remote, channel access.


V3 implemented lock sets in order to prevent different threads
V4 allows channel access to the following types of fields:
from simultaneously accessing linked records.
 
Instead of lock sets V4:
* Implements a per record instance lock.
* Defines a rule that allows two records to be locked without deadlocks
 
=== Posting Monitors ===
 
In V3 monitors are posted when code (record support, device support, database access, etc) calls db_post_event. In V4 database access will itself handle
the posting of monitors.
 
All changes to database fields are done via an interface implemented by database
access. This makes it possible for database access to handle monitors.
 
=== Database Field Types ===
 
The early releases of V4 will support Channel Access and Database Access to the
following types of fields:


* primitive types
* primitive types
* string
* string
* one dimensional array of primitive or string
* one dimensional array of primitive or string or struct
* struct with fields of following types:
* struct with fields of following types:
** primitive
** primitive
** string
** string
** array of primitive or string
** struct
** array of primitive or string or struct


Later releases will provide access to more complicated fields.
For other database field types, i.e. links, the database will make the field
appear as one of the above types. For example a link field will appear
as a string with syntax that matches the information associated with the link.
For example a process link will have a string something like
    support(processLink) ProcessLink(pvname = 'pvname'; wait = true)
where
; <tt>processLink</tt>
: selects the support for a process link
; <tt>ProcessLink</tt>
: Names the struct that the support uses for configuration information




----
<center>
<center>
== V4 Record Processing ==
= Record Processing Semantics =
  </center>
  </center>


This section describes the semantics implemented by dbProcess.
This section describes the semantics implemented by dbProcess.


dbProcess maintains a variable processState which is passed to iocRecord
The following are involved in record processing
and to record support and can also be returned by them.
* dbProcess
** implements a queue for local records that are processed because of record links
** posts monitors caused by field changes during record processing
* record support
** calls support code for RecordCommon fields
** is responsible for record instance fields
** calls link/struct support via interfaces implemented by the support
* link support
** can be links to other records, to driver support, etc
** implements interfaces called by record and/or other support
* struct support
** is responsible for the fields in the struct
** implements interfaces called by record and/or other support


== V4 Processing States ==
== Processing Life Cycle ==
Assume a record instance is idle, i.e. is ready to start processing.
*dbProcess calls record support with one of the following states
** processCancel - record support must terminate any outstanding processing
** processStart - start processing. record support returns one of
*** processDone - All done and successful
*** processQuit - dont do any more processing. Return to idle state
*** processActive - not done. Call again
** processContinue - another request to process while record is active. Record support again returns one of the above.


processState is passed to process (iocRecord or record support) and is also
Record support, with associated link/struct support does the following:
returned by process.  processState defines the states:
* When it is called for processStart
; processIdle
** calls the support for RecordCommon with state processStart. it returns
: record is not being processed
*** processDone - Record support starts processing record specific fields
; processStart
*** processQuit - Record support just returns processQuit to dbProcess
: processing is starting
*** processActive - Record returns processActive. It will be called again with state processContinue. It calls RecordCommon support with state processActive. This continues until Record Common returns processDone or processQuit
; processInputActive
* When RecordCommon returns processDone record support starts processing record specific fields
: iocRecord is waiting for input links to complete
** Associated link or struct support may be called
; processActive
*** Record support implements any <tt>block</tt> fields.
: record support is waiting for completion of record specific activity
*** It detects when asynchronous support completes
; processOutputActive
*** as long as there is incomplete asynchronous support it returns processActive to dbProcess
: iocRecord is waiting for output and process links to complete
** When all record specific fields have been processed it calls RecordCommon suport with state processQuit
; processDone
*** RecordCommon support can return processActive. Until it returns processDone, record support just returns processActive to dbProcess
: process has completed.
** When RecordCommon returns processDone, record support returns processDone to dbProcess.


NOTES:
 
* Record support can implement substates. For example the sequence record keeps state about which link set it is processing.
struct and link fields can have associated support
* Individual record types might use only a subset of the above states.
* associated support may be asynchronous
* V3 link instances had attributes like CA, CP, CPP. For V4 these should be something like:
** support returns indicating that it is active
** process - a request to process the record before gets or after puts.
** support is required to detect when asynchronous support completes
** wait - a request to wait until it has processed all it's input links
** when processing is complete support returns indicating that it is done.
** parallel - OK to allow simultaneous gets or puts
* whenever record support returns to dbProcess, dbProcess posts any fields that were modified.
** record may be active or done
* when record support returns processDone or processQuit record is again set idle.




== dbProcess ==


The functionality described in this section will be divided between
== record common ==
iocCore and iocRecord. iocRecord is the V4 successor to the V3 dbCommon.
For V4 it is a separate software component.


NOTE: FLNK (forward link) is replaced by an array of process links.
These fields are optional but it is expected that most record
types will include a standard set of fields.


The support for RecordCommon processes the following fields:


When dbProcess is called the action it takes depends on processState.
* at the beginning of record processing
* processIdle
** disabled - if true NO processing will be done, i.e. processQuit is returned
** prepare the record for processing
** scanDisable
** set state = processStart and goto processInputActive
*** has associated support
* processInputActive - call iocRecord
*** if record is scan disabled processQuit is returned
** If iocRecord returns processInputActive return
** alarm fields
** If iocRecord returns processActive set processState = processStart and goto processActive
*** alarm handling is described below
** If iocRecord returns processDone goto processDone
* after record support completes
* processActive - Call record support
** processLink array
** If record support returns processActive return
*** has associated support
** If record support returns processDone goto processOutputActive
* processOutputActive - Call iocRecord
** If iocRecord returns processOutputActive return
** If iocRecord returns processDone goto state processDone
* processDone
** Perform final processing - See below for details.
** set processState = processIdle
** return


NOTES:
== record support ==
* Record support is called with state processStart or processActive. It can return processActive as often as it wants. This supports the semantics of both the motor and sequence records.
* The semantics support the following model
** iocRecord processes all its input links and then
** Record support stays active as long as desired and then
** iocRecord processes all its output links and then
** dbProcess does final processing and sets the record idle.


Record support is responsible for all its fields.
For link and struct fields there may be associated support which
may be synchronous or asynchronous.
Record support communicates with
the link/struct support via interfaces that are implemented by the support.
If the record includes a field for struct(RecordCommon) it should
use the associated support for its fields.


The remaining subsections provide more details about each processState. Keep in mind
Record support may be called multiple times by dbProcess while a record instance
that some actions are performed by dbProcess, some by iocRecord,
is active.
some by record support, and some by link support.
One of the arguments to process is ProcessState which has the values:
* processCancel - Cancel any outstanding activity
* processStart - Start processing
* processContinue - Making additional call


=== processState processIdle ===
process returns ProcessReturn which is one of the following:
When dbProcess is called with processIdle then it:
* processDone - Done and successful
* prepares record for processing
* processQuit - Do not do any more processing
* calls iocRecord with processState processStart
* processActive - Not done


=== processState processStart ===
If record support returns processActive it must keep internal state so
that it knows how to handle processCancel and processContinue.


When iocRecord is called with processState processStart it:
* initializes severity. See Alarm Processing for details.
* initializes status. See Alarm Processing for details.
* starts processing it's input links. Details are given below.
* returns with processState one of the following:
** processInputActive - dbProcess will again call iocRecord.
** processActive - dbProcess will set processState to processStart and call record support.
** processDone - dbProcess will complete processing. record support will NOT be called and iocRecord will not be called to handle output links


When record support is called with processState processStart it:
For record support the above rules allow:
* starts processing
* process can be called repeatedly. This will continue as long as it returns processActive
* returns with processState one of the following:
* Everytime process returns processActive DbProcess posts monitors.
** processActive - dbProcess will again call record support
** processDone - dbProcess will call iocRecord to process it's output links


=== processState processInputActive ===  
== Record Locking ==


This state means that one or more input links handled by iocRecord have not
V3 implemented lock sets in order to prevent different threads
completed.
from simultaneously accessing linked records.


When iocRecord detects that all it's input
Instead of lock sets V4:
links have completed, it sets processState = processActive and returns.
* implements a per record instance lock.
dbProcess will then call record support to start processing.
* defines a rule that allows two records to be locked without deadlocks


iocRecord can also return processDone, In this case dbProcess will just
== Posting Monitors ==
do final cleanup and set state back to processIdle. This is done,
for example if iocRecord finds the record disabled.


=== processState processActive ===
In V3 monitors are posted when code (record support, device support, database access, etc) calls db_post_event. In V4 database access will itself handle
the posting of monitors.


This state means that record support and associated device support
Monitors are posted by DbProcess when
are waiting for something to complete. Examples are:
* record support returns processActive.
* wait for links to complete
* at the end of record processing.
* wait for a motor to reach some position.


The record, however, can be processed so that it can
<center>
report intermediate data values, e.g. the current motor position.
= link/struct Semantics =
For example the record can be periodically scanned.
</center>


When record support is called it returns one of:
Both link and struct fields can have associated support.
* processActive - dbProcess will post monitors and call record support again when it is called.
The support can be synchronous or asynchronous.
* processDone - dbProcess will call iocRecord to process it's output links


=== processState processOutputActive ===
Support code implements interfaces.
Code that is responsible for a field communicates with the support via
the interface. Lets call this code the client.


This state means that one or more output links handled by iocRecord have not
Each link and struct field has a well defined client.
completed.
* The support for RecordCommon is the client for fields in dbCommon
* record support is the client for the other top level fields in a record
* the struct support is the client for any link or struct fields in the struct


A link/struct may have an associated block. The client is responsible for
implementing block. If block is true then the support will not be called
until all outstanding record activity completes.


=== processState processDone ===
<center>
= channelAccess links =
</center>


When both record support and iocRecord have reported that they are done,
channelAccess link means access to a record or field. The requester can be:
dbProcess does some final steps and then sets the processState to processIdle.
* A database link in a record
* A channel access link in a record
* A workstation channel access client


The final steps are:
A channelAccess link is one of the following types:
* Monitor Link
** Implemented via a monitor request on linked field
** Optionally process record containing the link when monitor value is returned.
* Input Link
** Optionally request that record be processed.
** Optionally wait for linked record to complete processing.
** Get value.
* Output Link:
** Put value
** Optionally request processing.
** Optionally wait until completion
* Process Link: Perform the following actions
** Request processing
** Optionally wait until linked record completes


* If the request to process the record included a callback, the callback is called.
NOTES:
* If other record completion callback requests are present, call them.
* processLink is the replacement for the V3 forwardLink
* Monitors???
* wait does NOT mean to wait synchronously. It means to save state, return, and resume at the saved state when called again.
* ???
* The record is set idle.


=== Links to Other Records ===
Links are processed as follows:


Links can be processed in parallel, sequentially, or a
The following rules apply when a process request is made:
combination of these. iocRecord handles the links in iocRecord and record
* If record is already being processed the request is just ignored
support handles record specific input links. The support is responsible for
* record support can specify that links to particular fields not cause processing.
implementing sequential or parallel link processing.
** Where should this be specified?  In the Database Definition, the record instance, or both.
Link support doeso the actual I/O. The Link support methods
** If a process request is allowed, should it be done regardless of the scan mechanism, i.e. the record does not have to be passive?
provide options specifying if the linked record should be processed and
provide a callback to call when link processing completes. It is up to
iocRecord or record support to again call dbProcess when all input links
complete.


If is OK for dbProcess to be called multiple times while links
are being processed.


----
----
<center>
<center>
== Mutual Exclusion ==
= Mutual Exclusion =
  </center>
  </center>


Line 323: Line 358:
Lock sets solved two Mutual Exclusion problems:
Lock sets solved two Mutual Exclusion problems:
* V3 allowed dbProcess to be called recursively.
* V3 allowed dbProcess to be called recursively.
** process passive database links and forward links were implemented via recursive calls to dbProcess
** process passive database links and forward links were implemented via recursive calls to DbProcess
** Lock sets prevented deadly embrace problems for circular links.
** Lock sets prevented deadly embrace problems for circular links.
* No puts could be done to an record in a lock set while record processing is active.
* No puts could be done to a record in a lock set while record processing is active.
** For synchronous records this guarantees that no fields are modified except by record processing itself.
** For synchronous records this guarantees that no fields are modified except by record processing itself.
** For asynchronous records this guarantee is not valid.
** For asynchronous records this guarantee is not valid.
Line 335: Line 370:
* The record is already queued.
* The record is already queued.


Note that if all linked records are passive and the same priority then
dbProcess itself manages the queue , which is FIFO.
all processing can occur without any context switches.
When record support returns the first entry in the queue is processed.
The following occurs:
In addition if link or struct support completes before the queue
* A request is made to a thread to call dbProcess.
is empty, a request to process the record containing the link/struct will
** The request is put on a queue associated with the thread.
be added to the same queue.
* Sometime later the request is dequeued and dbProcess is called.
Thus if a set of synchronous records are processed they will complete processing
** For each link process request the request is put on the queue for the same thread
without any context switch.
** After all requests are queued dbProcess returns
 
* The thread takes each request off the queue and calls dbProcess for the associated linked record
<b>Question</b> What about periodically scanned records? Needs thought.
** When all linked records finish processing a request is queued to call dbProcess for the original record
* The request for the original record is removed from the queue and it's dbProcess is again called.
** The record completes.


This leaves the question of what should be done about mutual exclusion.
This leaves the question of what should be done about mutual exclusion.


Each record instance has an associated lock maintained by dbAccess.
For V4 there will be two locks associated with the IOC database:
1) a global lock, and 2) A per record instance lock.
 
The global lock must be taken
whenever the structure of the database is modified. Examples are
1) adding new record types, 2) adding new record instances, and 3) modifying
database links. Global locks are not discussed further in this document.
 
Each record instance has an associated lock.
When dbProcess is called it takes the lock.
When dbProcess is called it takes the lock.
Before it returns it unlocks.
Before it returns it unlocks.
Thus iocRecord and record support do not need to lock or unlock.
Thus record support does not need to lock or unlock.


Other code that needs access to fields of a record instance must call
Other code that needs access to fields of a record instance must
dbLock before accessing any fields and dbUnlock after all accesses are complete.
lock before accessing any fields and unlock after all accesses are complete.


This leaves the problem of how to access fields from two different record
This leaves the problem of how to access fields from two different record
Line 367: Line 407:
* If the ordinal number of X is less than that of Y
* If the ordinal number of X is less than that of Y
** Just call dbLock for record Y
** Just call dbLock for record Y
* If the ordinal numnber of X is less than that of Y
* If the ordinal numnber of X is greater than that of Y
** call dbUnlock for X
** call dbUnlock for X
** call dbLock for Y
** call dbLock for Y
** call dbLock for X
** call dbLock for X


dbUnlockLink just calls dbUnlock for the linked record.
----
----
<center>
<center>
== Posting Modifications ==
= Posting Modifications =
  </center>
  </center>


The document "V4 Design: dbdIterfaces" provides a design that
The document "V4 Design: dbdIterfaces" provides a design that allows
allows dbAccess to detect all changes to fields of an IOC record.
database access to handle all posting on monitors without requiring
 
dbAccess handles all posting on monitors without requiring
any help from the code that modifies database fields.
any help from the code that modifies database fields.
It can do this because fields can be modified only via an
interface implemented by database access.


Monitors are handled as follows:
dbProcess posts monitors when:
* When record support returns processActive.
* When it finishes record processing.


Each field of a record instance has an associated "modified" bit.
How to implement monitors must be decided.
 
Monitors will be handled via the calls to dbLock/dbUnlock.
* When dbLock is called all modify bits are false.
* Each field modification causes the associated modify bit to be set true.
* When dbUnlock is called it
** posts all fields that have changed
** sets the associated modify bit false
 
Note that when dbLockLink is called it may call dbUnlock, which will
post any changes. Record suppot needs to be aware that this can happen.
If it want fields to update only at the end of record processing,
it can keep private variables and then modify fields at the end of record
processing.
 
The following is the initial attempt to describe how monitors are implemented.
 
The following definitions are used:
* monitor - A client has asked to be notified when a field value changes.
* post - Create storage, copy the current value of the field into the storage, and pass the storage to the monitor subsystem.
 
 
The problem is how to implement posting.
Separate discussions is required for the following: 1) primitive fields,
2) string fields, 3) structured fields, and  4) array fields.
 
The following are just some thoughts.
 
* primitive fields - No problems.
* string fields - Memory is an issue.
** Should there be a way to postpone posting until the monitor is ready to retrieve the value?
** If so who decides?
* struct fields - Memory is again an issue.
** Structure with only primitive field or string should be posted immediately but what about array fields?
** Who decides?
** How?
* array fields - memory is an issue
** It should be possible to post small arrays of primitive type.
** Large arrays should not be posted until monitor system is ready to accept the data.
*** It should also be possible to just notify the client that the array changed but the client must issue a read request to retrieve the data.


----
----
<center>
<center>
== Alarm Processing ==
= Alarm Processing =
  </center>
  </center>
<b>Question</b> Will V4 alarm handling be different than V3? If so this section
may be meaningless.


The V4 semantics for status and severity have the following goals:
The V4 semantics for status and severity have the following goals:
* alarmSeverity has the same values as for V3
* alarmSeverity has the same values as for V3
* status is independent of alarmSeverity, i.e. it just reports a status.
* alarmStatus is a string
* a record starts processing with alarmSeverity = "NO_ALARM" and status empty.
* a record starts processing with alarmSeverity = "NO_ALARM" and status empty.
* status will ONLY be posted if it has changed since the last time it was posted.
* status will ONLY be posted if it has changed since the last time it was posted.
* alarmSeverity will ONLY be posted if it has changed since the last time it was posted
* alarmSeverity will ONLY be posted if it has changed since the last time it was posted


The semantics that implement these goals are:
The semantics, which are implemented by the support for RecordCommon, are:


* When a record starts processing the following is done
* When recordCommon is called with processStart
** The status is saved in previousStatus
** A private variable newSeverity is set to NO_ALARM
** status is set to an empty string
** A private variable prevSeverity is set to alarmSeverity
** The alarmSeverity is saved in previousAlarmSeverity
* When recordCommon completes its part of record processing
** alarmSeverity is set to NO_ALARM
** If newSeverity is NO_ALARM and prevSeverity has a different value
* When the status is modified
*** alarmSeverity is set to NO_ALARM
** If the new status is different than previousStatus
*** alarmStatus is set to empty
*** previousStatus is set to the new status
*** the status modified bit is set
* When the alarmSeverity is modified
** If the new alarmSeverity is different than previousAlarmSeverity
*** previousAlarmSeverity is set to the new alarmSeverity
*** the alarmSeverity modified bit is set
* When monitors are posted
** If status != previousStatus the status modified bit is set
** If alarmSeverity != previousAlarmSeverity the alarmSeverity modified bit is set
**  If the status modified bit is set the status is posted and previousStatus set equal to status
**  If the alarmSeverity modified bit is set the alarmSeverity is posted and previousAlarmSeverity set equal to alarmSeverity


Question: What is done by iocRecord and what by database access?
* When the recordCommon.setSeverity(sevr,status) is called
** If sevr is less than or equal to newSeverity nothing is done
** else
*** alarmSeverity is set to sevr
*** alarmStatus is set to status
*** newSeverity is set to sevr


NOTE: alarmStatus and alarmSeverity are written by the normal method.
This means that their values will be posted.
----
----
<center>
<center>
== Channel Access/ Database Access field types ==
= Channel Access/ Database Access field types =
  </center>
  </center>


NOTE: This topic still needs lots of discussion.


=== Overview ===
== Overview ==


This section discusses how IOC database fields are accessed by channel access
This section discusses how IOC database fields are accessed by channel access
Line 476: Line 476:
For the initial V4 implementation only the following types of data
For the initial V4 implementation only the following types of data
will be accessable.
will be accessable.
(Later releases of V4 will support more complicated types.)


* primitive types
* primitive types
* string
* string
* enum
* enum
* one dimensional array of primitive or string
* one dimensional array of primitive or string or struct
* struct with fields of following types:
* struct with fields of following types:
** primitive
** primitive
** string
** string
** enum
** enum
** one dimensional array of primitive or string
** struct (use recursion for allowed types)
** one dimensional array of primitive or string or struct


The dbdInterfaces document defines database field types.
It also defines a subset called basic types, which consists
of primitive types, string, array, and structure.
For external access only basic types can be accessed.
This means that structures and arrays that do not consist of basic types
are not accessablevia clannelAccess. For example a DbfLink is
not accessable via channel access as a DbfLink.
Non basic fields will only be available via some combination of basic types.


Other fields will only be available as one of the above types.
For example a DbfLink field will appear as a string.
For example a DbfLink field will appear as a string.
 
If a Database Definition is
Since the field view provides access to subfields of a field and to
elements of an array, information from every DbfType is available.
 
As an example if a Database Definition is


     struct(calcInpLink) {
     struct(calcInpLink) {
         field(link,link(in))
        field(block,boolean)
         field(link,link)
         field(value,float64)
         field(value,float64)
     };
     };
      
      
     struct(calcInpLink) {
     record(xxx) {
         field(link,link(in))
         field(link,link)
         field(value,float64)
         field(value,float64)
     ...
     ...
Line 510: Line 515:
     }
     }


Then if a client attaches to process variable:
If a client attaches to  
     record.field(calcInpLink[1].link)
     record.field(link)
The data will be presented as a string describing the link.
The data will be appear in the form:
An example of a string value is:
    choice(choiceName) SupportStruct(pvname= ...)
    acro9440(0,5)
where <tt>choiceName</tt> is the name of the link support, <tt>SupportStruct</tt> is the name of the support struct asociated with the support, and the arguments are the values for the support structure.


Then if a client specifies the process variable:
    record.field(inp[1].link)
Then it connects to the link field of the second calcInpLink of field inp.


=== primitive types ===
 
== primitive types ==


This includes DbfBool, DbfOctet, DbfInt16, ... , DbfFloat64.
This includes DbfBool, DbfOctet, DbfInt16, ... , DbfFloat64.
These do not present any problems. The scalar value is transfered.
These do not present any problems. The scalar value is transfered.


=== string ===
== string ==


A string is just a UTF_8 encoded character string
A string is just a UTF_8 encoded character string


=== DbfMenu  and DbfEnum ===
== DbfMenu  and DbfEnum ==


Handled as an enum
Handled as an enum




=== DbfLink and DbfDevice ===
== DbfLink ==
 
Both of these have the following:
 
* <tt>choiceName</tt> A string that selects the link or device support.
* <tt>dataStruct</tt> Each support has an associated struct for configuration.
 
How should the be made available? Perhaps:
 
The field appears as a string with the following syntax:


<tt>choiceName(structAssignmentList)</tt>
A string with the same syntax as defined for a link field in "V4 DB Record Instance Syntax"


where structAssignmentList has the same syntax as defined in "V4 DB Record Instance Syntax"
== timeStamp ==


=== timeStamp ===
This is just transfered like a struct with two fields:
 
This is just transfered a struct with two fields:
* int64 secondsSinceEpoch
* int64 secondsSinceEpoch
* int32 nanoSeconds
* int32 nanoSeconds


=== struct ===


The database definition syntax allows a struct to be composed of fields
== struct ==
of any DbfType.
Database access, however, will only allow access to structs with fields
of the following types:
* primitive - DbfBool,...,DbfFloat64
* DbfString
* DbfArray of primitive type or string


The individual fields can be accessed directly so this discussion
The individual fields can be accessed directly so this discussion
only involves access to the entire structure.
only involves access to the entire structure.


Note that if a struct contains a field that is a DbfStruct,
The entire structure can be accessed as a string with the same syntax
the struct field itself will not be available but
as defined for a struct field in "V4 DB Record Instance Syntax"
it is possible to access the DbfStruct field itself if it
is contains fields of the above types.
 
The following two forms of access available.
 
* Access by clients that have knowledge of the structure -
** In this case the data is transfered as a sequence of field values.
** Do this via dataAccess property catalog.
* Access by clients that do not know about the structure -
**The structure value is presented as a string that has the structAssignmentList syntax defined in "V4 DB Record Instance Syntax"
** Is this needed? Can we just require that client know property catalog?




=== array ===
== array ==


Arrays of the following types are accessable:
Arrays of the following types are accessable:
* primitive - DbfBool,...,DbfFloat64
* primitive - DbfBool,...,DbfFloat64
* DbfString
* DbfString
* DbfStruct - As long as its fields are valid types


Note that arrays of structs are not accessable in the early V4 releases.
Note that arrays of structs are not accessable in the early V4 releases.


Arrays still need lots more discussion!!!
Arrays still need lots more discussion!!!
Database Access is implemented so that record/link/device support can transfer an array in segments. Examples:
* If the array is a circular buffer, it is presented in two segements
* If the array is stored in hardware, e.g. a transient recorder, the array can be read from the hardware and passed to the client in segments.
The database definition syntax allow an array to be any of the basic types, i.e. DbfBool,...,DbfFloat64, DbfString, DbfArray, DbfStruct.
The database definition syntax allow an array to be any of the basic types, i.e. DbfBool,...,DbfFloat64, DbfString, DbfArray, DbfStruct.


Database access only allows access to arrays of the following types.
For the initial V4 version, database access only allows access to arrays of the following types.
* primitive - DbfBool,...,DbfFloat64
* primitive - DbfBool,...,DbfFloat64
* DbfString
* DbfString
* ???? What else


An individual element of an array of type DbfStruct can be accessed
An individual element of an array of type DbfStruct can be accessed
directly if it satisfies the criteria for accessing a DbfStruct.
directly if it satisfies the criteria for accessing a DbfStruct.


How to prevent two clients from trying to access the same array simultaneously?
Question: Should database Access be implemented so that record/link support can transfer an array in segments. Examples:
* Does it matter?
* If the array is a circular buffer, it is presented in two segements
* If application wants to allow only single access let the apllication solve the problem
* If the array is stored in hardware, e.g. a transient recorder, the array can be read from the hardware and passed to the client in segments.
** runControl records are one solution
** Other solutions can be envisioned
* Conclusion is that this is not a database responsibility


If an array is available only in segments then can we
prevent two clients from trying to access the same array simultaneously?


=== MDArray ===
Perhaps this is a problem that must be solved by an application:
* runControl records are one solution
* Other solutions can be envisioned
 
 
== MDArray ==


Not implemented if the early V4 releases.
Not implemented if the early V4 releases.


=== Associated Data ===
== Associated Data ==


The typical example is a client that asks for timeStamp, severity, status,
The typical example is a client that asks for timeStamp, severity, status,
and data.
and data.
These will be handled automatically as described in "Posting Modifications"

Latest revision as of 19:52, 2 November 2005

EPICS V4: Record Processing November 02 2005


Overview

UNRESOLVED ISSUES

  • This document is still evolving
  • Monitors
    • How will monitor data be managed?
    • Big problem is how will array data be managed?
  • Alarms
    • How will V4 handle alarms?
  • Events
    • What is the V4 event model?
    • What is required from the IOC database?

This document described semantics for V4 record processing that are different than for V3. This includes the following:

  • Semantics for record processing
  • Semantics for Database and Channel Access Links.
  • Record Locking
  • Posting database monitors
  • Status and Alarm Severity
  • Access to array and structure fields.

This version is based on feedback from the EPICS core developer's meeting at ANL/APS on July 11th through July 14th. In addition discussions with Andrew Johnson and Eric Norum have led to many of the ideas described below. This wiki is a companion to the wiki "V4 Design: dbdInterfaces".

V3 record processing semantics do not work well for data acquisition applications. An example of data acquisition is:

  • Move sample to new position.
    • Several motors may be involved
    • While moving post monitors to show current position, etc.
  • Sample data
  • Wait until CA client has fetched the data before next move.

SynAPPS provides the Scan, motor, etc records which help with data processing applications. These records process as follows:

  • Record does not complete processing until all inputs, outputs, etc done. Not completing means that they do not call recGblFwdLink until all proccessing is complete. Note that recGblFwdLink is what causes the V3 ioc to complete record processing.
  • While waiting for asynchronous events these records have PACT=0 but keep state that shows it is still active
  • Can be scanned and issue monitors while internal state is active

Leaving PACT 0 but not calling recGblFwdLink was not anticipated when the V3 record processing semantics were created. For V4 a record can be processed while it is waiting for asynchronous processing to complete.

In V3, if an input link is asynchronous, Process Passive does not wait for asynchronous processing to complete before fetching data. This also complicated data acquisition applications.

V4 record processing is designed to make data acquisition easier. Both input and output links can wait for record processing. This is done, however, without record support blocking. If blocking makes it easier to implement record support, then the support can spawn a separate thread that does block. Record support can communicate with the separate thread to decide when to complete record processing.


Overview of V4 Record Processing

V4 will provide a replacement for dbProcess. The name may be different but for now it will still be called dbProcess.

In V4 database access and channel access appear the same to record and link support. Only the implementation knows the difference. In this document the term channelAccess will mean access to a record. Thus it can mean a workstation client or a field of a record that is a link to a record.

V4 also allows support for struct fields. For example base provides support for

    field(common,struct(RecordCommon))

In the record types provided with base, this is the first field. The fields in RecordCommon are the V4 replacement for the V3 dbCommon fields.


V4 record processing has the following features.

  • database fields
    • "owned" by database not record support
    • fields can only be accessed via interfaces
    • support can optionally provide storage for data associated with a field
    • for channelAccess all fields appear as type primitive, string, struct, array or combination thereof
  • dbProcess
    • processes synchronous linked records by queuing requests rather than recursive calls to dbProcess
    • can be called an arbitrary number of times while record is active
  • link
    • always has associated support
    • can be record link or can be something else, e.g. a link to hardware
  • record link
    • can request process and/or wait for asynchronous completion
    • local synchronous requests queued by dbProcess
    • record is active and can be processed while asynchronous links active
  • struct fields
    • Can have associated support which can be synchronous or asynchronous
  • block
    • is requested via a separate field
    • if true than support waits for all outstanding I/O to complete before further processing
    • if false than asynchronous support can proceed in parallel
  • lock
    • record instances are locked
    • dbProcess locks before calling support
    • other code can also lock
    • Two records can be locked without deadlock
  • monitors
    • dbProcess handles monitors
    • support triggers monitors by writing to fields


Database Fields

Field Access by Support Code

Support code can access database fields only via interfaces implemented by the IOC database. Thus record fields are owned by the IOC database not by record support.

Support code can register to provide storage for particular fields. For example support code could implement a circular buffer for field value. When some other code request the array associated with value, the IOC database calls the support. The support returns the first portion of the circular buffer and the caller must make an additional call to retrieve the rest of the circular buffer.

Field Access by Channel Access

For V4 database access and channel access appear the same to record instances. It is only the code that implements link support that knows the difference. If a linked record is local, database access is used, and, if the record is remote, channel access.

V4 allows channel access to the following types of fields:

  • primitive types
  • string
  • one dimensional array of primitive or string or struct
  • struct with fields of following types:
    • primitive
    • string
    • struct
    • array of primitive or string or struct

For other database field types, i.e. links, the database will make the field appear as one of the above types. For example a link field will appear as a string with syntax that matches the information associated with the link. For example a process link will have a string something like

   support(processLink) ProcessLink(pvname = 'pvname'; wait = true)

where

processLink
selects the support for a process link
ProcessLink
Names the struct that the support uses for configuration information


Record Processing Semantics

This section describes the semantics implemented by dbProcess.

The following are involved in record processing

  • dbProcess
    • implements a queue for local records that are processed because of record links
    • posts monitors caused by field changes during record processing
  • record support
    • calls support code for RecordCommon fields
    • is responsible for record instance fields
    • calls link/struct support via interfaces implemented by the support
  • link support
    • can be links to other records, to driver support, etc
    • implements interfaces called by record and/or other support
  • struct support
    • is responsible for the fields in the struct
    • implements interfaces called by record and/or other support

Processing Life Cycle

Assume a record instance is idle, i.e. is ready to start processing.

  • dbProcess calls record support with one of the following states
    • processCancel - record support must terminate any outstanding processing
    • processStart - start processing. record support returns one of
      • processDone - All done and successful
      • processQuit - dont do any more processing. Return to idle state
      • processActive - not done. Call again
    • processContinue - another request to process while record is active. Record support again returns one of the above.

Record support, with associated link/struct support does the following:

  • When it is called for processStart
    • calls the support for RecordCommon with state processStart. it returns
      • processDone - Record support starts processing record specific fields
      • processQuit - Record support just returns processQuit to dbProcess
      • processActive - Record returns processActive. It will be called again with state processContinue. It calls RecordCommon support with state processActive. This continues until Record Common returns processDone or processQuit
  • When RecordCommon returns processDone record support starts processing record specific fields
    • Associated link or struct support may be called
      • Record support implements any block fields.
      • It detects when asynchronous support completes
      • as long as there is incomplete asynchronous support it returns processActive to dbProcess
    • When all record specific fields have been processed it calls RecordCommon suport with state processQuit
      • RecordCommon support can return processActive. Until it returns processDone, record support just returns processActive to dbProcess
    • When RecordCommon returns processDone, record support returns processDone to dbProcess.


struct and link fields can have associated support

  • associated support may be asynchronous
    • support returns indicating that it is active
    • support is required to detect when asynchronous support completes
    • when processing is complete support returns indicating that it is done.
  • whenever record support returns to dbProcess, dbProcess posts any fields that were modified.
    • record may be active or done
  • when record support returns processDone or processQuit record is again set idle.


record common

These fields are optional but it is expected that most record types will include a standard set of fields.

The support for RecordCommon processes the following fields:

  • at the beginning of record processing
    • disabled - if true NO processing will be done, i.e. processQuit is returned
    • scanDisable
      • has associated support
      • if record is scan disabled processQuit is returned
    • alarm fields
      • alarm handling is described below
  • after record support completes
    • processLink array
      • has associated support

record support

Record support is responsible for all its fields. For link and struct fields there may be associated support which may be synchronous or asynchronous. Record support communicates with the link/struct support via interfaces that are implemented by the support. If the record includes a field for struct(RecordCommon) it should use the associated support for its fields.

Record support may be called multiple times by dbProcess while a record instance is active. One of the arguments to process is ProcessState which has the values:

  • processCancel - Cancel any outstanding activity
  • processStart - Start processing
  • processContinue - Making additional call

process returns ProcessReturn which is one of the following:

  • processDone - Done and successful
  • processQuit - Do not do any more processing
  • processActive - Not done

If record support returns processActive it must keep internal state so that it knows how to handle processCancel and processContinue.


For record support the above rules allow:

  • process can be called repeatedly. This will continue as long as it returns processActive
  • Everytime process returns processActive DbProcess posts monitors.

Record Locking

V3 implemented lock sets in order to prevent different threads from simultaneously accessing linked records.

Instead of lock sets V4:

  • implements a per record instance lock.
  • defines a rule that allows two records to be locked without deadlocks

Posting Monitors

In V3 monitors are posted when code (record support, device support, database access, etc) calls db_post_event. In V4 database access will itself handle the posting of monitors.

Monitors are posted by DbProcess when

  • record support returns processActive.
  • at the end of record processing.

link/struct Semantics

Both link and struct fields can have associated support. The support can be synchronous or asynchronous.

Support code implements interfaces. Code that is responsible for a field communicates with the support via the interface. Lets call this code the client.

Each link and struct field has a well defined client.

  • The support for RecordCommon is the client for fields in dbCommon
  • record support is the client for the other top level fields in a record
  • the struct support is the client for any link or struct fields in the struct

A link/struct may have an associated block. The client is responsible for implementing block. If block is true then the support will not be called until all outstanding record activity completes.

channelAccess links

channelAccess link means access to a record or field. The requester can be:

  • A database link in a record
  • A channel access link in a record
  • A workstation channel access client

A channelAccess link is one of the following types:

  • Monitor Link
    • Implemented via a monitor request on linked field
    • Optionally process record containing the link when monitor value is returned.
  • Input Link
    • Optionally request that record be processed.
    • Optionally wait for linked record to complete processing.
    • Get value.
  • Output Link:
    • Put value
    • Optionally request processing.
    • Optionally wait until completion
  • Process Link: Perform the following actions
    • Request processing
    • Optionally wait until linked record completes

NOTES:

  • processLink is the replacement for the V3 forwardLink
  • wait does NOT mean to wait synchronously. It means to save state, return, and resume at the saved state when called again.

Links are processed as follows:

The following rules apply when a process request is made:

  • If record is already being processed the request is just ignored
  • record support can specify that links to particular fields not cause processing.
    • Where should this be specified? In the Database Definition, the record instance, or both.
    • If a process request is allowed, should it be done regardless of the scan mechanism, i.e. the record does not have to be passive?



Mutual Exclusion

V3 implemented lock sets, i.e. when a record was being processed it and all records linked via database links were locked.

Lock sets solved two Mutual Exclusion problems:

  • V3 allowed dbProcess to be called recursively.
    • process passive database links and forward links were implemented via recursive calls to DbProcess
    • Lock sets prevented deadly embrace problems for circular links.
  • No puts could be done to a record in a lock set while record processing is active.
    • For synchronous records this guarantees that no fields are modified except by record processing itself.
    • For asynchronous records this guarantee is not valid.


V4 does not call dbProcess recursively. Instead a process request is queued. The request fails if either of the following is true:

  • The record is active.
  • The record is already queued.

dbProcess itself manages the queue , which is FIFO. When record support returns the first entry in the queue is processed. In addition if link or struct support completes before the queue is empty, a request to process the record containing the link/struct will be added to the same queue. Thus if a set of synchronous records are processed they will complete processing without any context switch.

Question What about periodically scanned records? Needs thought.

This leaves the question of what should be done about mutual exclusion.

For V4 there will be two locks associated with the IOC database: 1) a global lock, and 2) A per record instance lock.

The global lock must be taken whenever the structure of the database is modified. Examples are 1) adding new record types, 2) adding new record instances, and 3) modifying database links. Global locks are not discussed further in this document.

Each record instance has an associated lock. When dbProcess is called it takes the lock. Before it returns it unlocks. Thus record support does not need to lock or unlock.

Other code that needs access to fields of a record instance must lock before accessing any fields and unlock after all accesses are complete.

This leaves the problem of how to access fields from two different record instances simultaneously. For example code that implements database access needs such access. Code that needs such access must call dbLockLink before accessing the linked record and dbUnlockLink after access.

dbLockLink is implemented as follows:

  • Each Record instances has a unique ordinal number
  • Assume Record X has a link to record Y
  • If the ordinal number of X is less than that of Y
    • Just call dbLock for record Y
  • If the ordinal numnber of X is greater than that of Y
    • call dbUnlock for X
    • call dbLock for Y
    • call dbLock for X

Posting Modifications

The document "V4 Design: dbdIterfaces" provides a design that allows database access to handle all posting on monitors without requiring any help from the code that modifies database fields. It can do this because fields can be modified only via an interface implemented by database access.

dbProcess posts monitors when:

  • When record support returns processActive.
  • When it finishes record processing.

How to implement monitors must be decided.


Alarm Processing

Question Will V4 alarm handling be different than V3? If so this section may be meaningless.

The V4 semantics for status and severity have the following goals:

  • alarmSeverity has the same values as for V3
  • alarmStatus is a string
  • a record starts processing with alarmSeverity = "NO_ALARM" and status empty.
  • status will ONLY be posted if it has changed since the last time it was posted.
  • alarmSeverity will ONLY be posted if it has changed since the last time it was posted

The semantics, which are implemented by the support for RecordCommon, are:

  • When recordCommon is called with processStart
    • A private variable newSeverity is set to NO_ALARM
    • A private variable prevSeverity is set to alarmSeverity
  • When recordCommon completes its part of record processing
    • If newSeverity is NO_ALARM and prevSeverity has a different value
      • alarmSeverity is set to NO_ALARM
      • alarmStatus is set to empty
  • When the recordCommon.setSeverity(sevr,status) is called
    • If sevr is less than or equal to newSeverity nothing is done
    • else
      • alarmSeverity is set to sevr
      • alarmStatus is set to status
      • newSeverity is set to sevr

NOTE: alarmStatus and alarmSeverity are written by the normal method. This means that their values will be posted.


Channel Access/ Database Access field types


Overview

This section discusses how IOC database fields are accessed by channel access or via database links.

For the initial V4 implementation only the following types of data will be accessable.

  • primitive types
  • string
  • enum
  • one dimensional array of primitive or string or struct
  • struct with fields of following types:
    • primitive
    • string
    • enum
    • struct (use recursion for allowed types)
    • one dimensional array of primitive or string or struct

The dbdInterfaces document defines database field types. It also defines a subset called basic types, which consists of primitive types, string, array, and structure. For external access only basic types can be accessed. This means that structures and arrays that do not consist of basic types are not accessablevia clannelAccess. For example a DbfLink is not accessable via channel access as a DbfLink.

Non basic fields will only be available via some combination of basic types.

For example a DbfLink field will appear as a string. If a Database Definition is

    struct(calcInpLink) {
        field(block,boolean)
        field(link,link)
        field(value,float64)
    };
    
    record(xxx) {
        field(link,link)
        field(value,float64)
    ...
        field(inp,array(struct(calcInpLink)[]))
    ...
    }

If a client attaches to

    record.field(link)

The data will be appear in the form:

    choice(choiceName) SupportStruct(pvname= ...)

where choiceName is the name of the link support, SupportStruct is the name of the support struct asociated with the support, and the arguments are the values for the support structure.

Then if a client specifies the process variable:

    record.field(inp[1].link)

Then it connects to the link field of the second calcInpLink of field inp.


primitive types

This includes DbfBool, DbfOctet, DbfInt16, ... , DbfFloat64. These do not present any problems. The scalar value is transfered.

string

A string is just a UTF_8 encoded character string

DbfMenu and DbfEnum

Handled as an enum


DbfLink

A string with the same syntax as defined for a link field in "V4 DB Record Instance Syntax"

timeStamp

This is just transfered like a struct with two fields:

  • int64 secondsSinceEpoch
  • int32 nanoSeconds


struct

The individual fields can be accessed directly so this discussion only involves access to the entire structure.

The entire structure can be accessed as a string with the same syntax as defined for a struct field in "V4 DB Record Instance Syntax"


array

Arrays of the following types are accessable:

  • primitive - DbfBool,...,DbfFloat64
  • DbfString
  • DbfStruct - As long as its fields are valid types

Note that arrays of structs are not accessable in the early V4 releases.

Arrays still need lots more discussion!!! The database definition syntax allow an array to be any of the basic types, i.e. DbfBool,...,DbfFloat64, DbfString, DbfArray, DbfStruct.

For the initial V4 version, database access only allows access to arrays of the following types.

  • primitive - DbfBool,...,DbfFloat64
  • DbfString
  • ???? What else

An individual element of an array of type DbfStruct can be accessed directly if it satisfies the criteria for accessing a DbfStruct.

Question: Should database Access be implemented so that record/link support can transfer an array in segments. Examples:

  • If the array is a circular buffer, it is presented in two segements
  • If the array is stored in hardware, e.g. a transient recorder, the array can be read from the hardware and passed to the client in segments.

If an array is available only in segments then can we prevent two clients from trying to access the same array simultaneously?

Perhaps this is a problem that must be solved by an application:

  • runControl records are one solution
  • Other solutions can be envisioned


MDArray

Not implemented if the early V4 releases.

Associated Data

The typical example is a client that asks for timeStamp, severity, status, and data.